The Justice Department under President Trump reportedly requested the Supreme Court on Friday to suspend four ongoing cases related to environmental issues or student debt while the new administration deliberates on overturning the regulatory decisions that form the basis of the litigation.
None of the four cases has been scheduled for oral arguments; nonetheless, they are poised to be heard during the court’s March or April sessions and resolved within this term.
The Justice Department requested a suspension of all written briefing deadlines, so placing the cases on indefinite hold.
Furthermore, the Justice Department on Friday altered the Biden administration’s stance in the ongoing contention regarding Louisiana’s congressional layout, which incorporates an additional majority-Black district.
The Biden administration contended that the lower court utilized an incorrect legal framework in invalidating the design; nevertheless, Trump’s Justice Department is now retracting its stance and its request to participate in oral arguments this spring.
The approach of the incoming Justice Department towards the existing issues inherited from the Biden administration, especially the litigation concerning limitations on gender-affirming care for children currently progressing in the Supreme Court, remains ambiguous.
However, the recent filings initiate the customary reversals in contentious cases upon the inauguration of a new administration.
The Supreme Court is reviewing the government’s appeal against a ruling that obstructs a Biden administration regulation facilitating debt forgiveness for students duped by their college.
The motion suggests that the challengers do not contest the suspension of the lawsuit while the new administration considers revoking the rule.
The remaining three cases involve environmental restrictions, and court documents indicate that at least one party in each instance is opposing the suspension of the schedule.
Weeks following the election, the Supreme Court consented to evaluate the oil and biofuel industry’s attempt to eliminate California’s clean vehicles program, resurrected by Biden’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which would impose vehicle emissions rules that are more stringent than federal regulations.
The Trump administration additionally requested the Supreme Court to suspend two other environmental cases, both of which examine the appropriate venue for plaintiffs to file lawsuits when contesting specific EPA policies.
One issue is to the contention on the necessity for Oklahoma and Utah to develop improved strategies to combat smog, while the other relates to the potential exemption of some oil refineries from mandates requiring their gasoline to include a specified percentage of ethanol.
The Trump administration has not yet attempted to alter its stance on any ongoing lawsuit, although it retains the option to do so.
The list encompasses the dispute regarding the constitutionality of Tennessee’s prohibition on gender-affirming care for minors.
The Supreme Court reviewed the Biden administration’s appeal to the statute in December, and the government may withdraw its lawsuit initiated under Trump.
[READ MORE: Trump Shreds Zelensky for Bumbling into War With Putin]
